Tony Heller and science versus the billionaires and HHS

Sunday night collection of Tony Heller videos on record fires (from 1995, 1896 and 1898) and scams of the richest people in the world (see below) to mine Greenland, i.e., to destroy Greenland to save their wealth.

Some trolls like to make vapid attempts to smear Heller, name calling, calling for gaslighting and/or cancelling him, but none of them dispute his evidence or offer anything even approaching a counterargument other than to cite forecasts, computer models, media reports and 'expert' opinions, all of which lack the most basic of scientific evidence or credibility. Just as masks don't prevent one from getting or spreading the Covid variant, computer models of climate change don't prevent rational, logical, data-based arguments and hypothesis testing from correcting the false information spread by 'experts' mouthing the media and swamp narrative.

Here is another good, related example of the misuse of authority to spread scientific falsehoods, when Senator Rand Paul took to task Secretary Becerra, the lawyer who heads HHS, for deny people the right to use much more powerful naturally acquired immunity rather than the Covid vaccines to protect themselves. Paul cites chapter and verse while the secretary seems ignorant and oblivious to the science and who claims to rely on his small circle of 'experts' to tell him what to say.

It's almost as bad as an Instagram video I watched today, where a NASCAR driver who had just won a race -- Brandon was his first name -- was interviewed live by a mindless television reporter who claimed that the clear and loud chants of "F*ck Joe Biden!" was actually the crowd chanting, "Let's go, Brandon!" The reporter was making up false news on the fly, hearing what she wanted to hear or denying what she heard -- one or the other -- rather than let the truth surface naturally. As when a Seattle baseball fan was accused on using a pejorative term simply because the broadcaster projected his own thoughts rather than listen and report the real story, putting the fan under a microscope, investigated by the team, and subject to harassment, all because the broadcaster falsely accused the man of saying something the man did not say. The real offender here is the broadcast; he should pay the defamed fan a million dollars for slander.