The gaslighting of natural immunity
- Peter Lorenzi
- Nov 14, 2021
- 3 min read
November 14, 2021. Just when you thought natural immunity could not be any more confusing, Tony Heller explains how China, the Red Cross, the WHO and Big Pharma contributed to defrauding the public of a good defense against Covid.
First in line is China. How many people died of Covid in China? No one can be confident about any number from the Chinese government, with their phots of masked people dead in the streets, people having their apartment doors welded shut, and disingenuous claims about the source of the virus.
Remember when the assertion was that ventilators and respirators were essential to treating Covid? Whatever happened to that? Mt Sinai Hospital in New York recognized early on that not only does 'natural immunity' exist, it can be used to treat desperately ill Covid patients.

The Red Cross first rejected the blood of those who had been vaccinated, then pretended they had not made such a claim. Sorry, but the Internet does not easily forget, nor can it be easily erased. This does not just apply to drunken teenagers posting regrettable photos of their spring break activities, hoping employers won't find them.

"These claims that are circulating are inaccurate." What? These are what the Red Cross posted; they are not just some unsourced fabrications.

The World Health Organization changed their definition of herd immunity.

Politicians told us that vaccine mandates -- previously described by the same people as "never going to happen" -- would save us, only to see sates with high vaccination rates having a high number of Covid cases among those vaccinated.

Great Britain had no better luck in finding any truth to their claims about vaccinated herd immunity.

The elite media chastised Sweden for their "no lockdown" approach, only to be solidly rebuked by the facts: Sweden's death rate from Covid was one-third that of the long-lockdown USA.

Not to be outdone, per Dr. Scott Jensen, who is now a candidate for governor of Minnesota, our political and health 'leaders' lied to us, repeatedly, dismissively, baldly and continuously.

Pelosi, Fauci, Harris, and Biden all claimed that mask mandates and vaccine mandates are either illegal, inappropriate, unconstitutional, or otherwise wrong to even consider.
Jensen says, "A vaccine mandate is immoral."
So what to make of all this? There is a lot of noise amidst the lies. China must shoulder much of the blame and come clean on the source of the virus, gain of function research Wuhan, and the real number of Covid deaths in China. The WHO must also come clean, admit to its inaccuracies and bad recommendations. The CDC and Dr Fauci need to be held accountable for their outright lies and inconsistencies about masks, vaccines, immunity, lockdowns, mandates, co-morbidities and Covid death definitions. Progressive politicians must be held accountable for following the bureaucrats, not the science, and for wreaking economic havoc, especially upon the poor and marginalized; those in the bottom ten percent of the quality and quantity of life -- the 'extreme poor' -- deserve better than what they have been told, what they have been given, and what they have been denied.
Bottom line is that the culture wars have become the Covid wars and there is some positive evidence that people are beginning to take up a "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more," wherever they live, whatever their politics, and however they make this claim for human rights and individual freedom, rights and freedom that are not given to us at the whim of the elected. Instead, these are rights that the elected are assigned to protect, ensure and expand. And this means more negative rights (things that the government must not take from us) and not more positive rights (things government gives to us with taxpayer money). Negative rights include freedom of speech, assembly, peaceful grievance, religion, and the right to bear arms and tom protect one's poverty. This means applying the rule of law as a form of social justice, not as a political discretion, like actually arresting shoplifters and other criminals rather than turning a blind eye.
Comments