Media and 'expert' Covid ignorance

Ivor Cummins does it again. In an April 12 interview from Ireland he critiques, the media host is unaware of the reputation of the truly "foremost expert" cited by one member of the panel, so she basically rejects using the cited information. Pure ignorance, coupled with bias. Then the so-called expert on the panel also claims no knowledge of the cited expert. The same person who forecast 120,000 Covid deaths in Ireland, when the reality was "100 times less" than that forecast. Scientific arrogance and ignorance.

The 'unknown' expert is Stanford's John Ioannidis, with a focus on evidence-based public health, as illustrated here. Shameful ignorance from the media and the local, uninformed expert.

Cummins uses this embarrassment as a platform for dissecting the false narrative as to the IFR (infection fatality rate) of Covid-19, showing that unlike the mainstream 'expert' narrative, evidence and real scientific expertise shows that the IFR is about 0.15%, and not the 2% or 3% the media 'experts' have claimed.